example of trustworthiness in qualitative research

For example, Whittemore and colleagues (2001) prepared a synthesis of criteria that they viewed as essential to all qualitative inquiry. Some writers believe, however, that some quality criteria are fairly universal within the constructivist paradigm. Thus, different writers have offered standards for specific forms of qualitative inquiry, such as grounded theory, phenomenology, ethnography, and critical research. Some writers believe that research conducted within different disciplinary traditions must attend to different concerns and that techniques for enhancing research integrity vary. This position was proposed by Lincoln and Guba (1985), who created standards for the trustworthiness of qualitative research that parallel the standards of reliability and validity in quantitative research.Īnother controversy concerns whether there should be a generic set of quality standards or whether specific standards are needed for different qualitative traditions. A widely adopted stance is what has been called a parallel perspective. At the opposite extreme are those who berate the “absurdity” of validity. At one extreme are those who think that validity is an appropriate quality criterion in both quantitative and qualitative studies, although qualitative researchers use different methods to achieve it. The complex debate has given rise to a variety of positions. Morse (2015), for example, has argued that qualitative researchers should return to the terminology of the social sciences-i.e., rigor, reliability, validity, and generalizability. Others disagree with those opposing the term validity. For these critics, the concept of rigor is by its nature a term that does not fit into an interpretive paradigm that values insight and creativity. One contentious issue concerns use of the terms rigor and validity-terms some people shun because they are associated with the positivist paradigm.

We offer a brief overview of the arguments of the debate. Qualitative researchers agree on the importance of doing high-quality research, yet defining “high quality” has been controversial.

PERSPECTIVES ON QUALITY IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH Integrity in qualitative research is a critical issue for both those doing the research and those considering the use of qualitative evidence. Identify the quality criteria proposed in a major framework for evaluating quality and integrity in qualitative researchĭiscuss strategies for enhancing quality in qualitative researchĭescribe different dimensions relating to the interpretation of qualitative results Discuss some controversies relating to the issue of quality in qualitative research

Example of trustworthiness in qualitative research